E-ISSN:2456-3110

Research Article

Rajakoshataki

Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences

2022 Volume 7 Number 8 September
Publisherwww.maharshicharaka.in

Pharmacognostical evaluation of Rajakoshataki (Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb.

Balakrishnan A.1*, Faisal M.2, Prabhu S.3
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21760/jaims.7.8.4

1* Anju Balakrishnan, Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Dravya Guna, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Ayurveda, Udupi, Karnataka, India.

2 Mohammed Faisal, Associate Professor, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Ayurveda, Udupi, Karnataka, India.

3 Suchitra Prabhu, Research Officer, SDM Centre for Research in Ayurveda and Allied Sciences, Kuthpady, Udupi, Karnataka, India.

Introduction: Rajakoshataki (Luffa acutangula(L.) Roxb. is a succulent trailing climber that belongs to cucurbitaceae family. The present study attempts to evaluate macroscopy, microscopy, physio-chemical, phytochemical and HPTLC studies of different extracts of fruit of Luffa acutangular (L.)Roxb. Materials and Methods: Fresh Rajakoshataki fruit was collected from the local vegetable market, Udupi. Sample was preserved in fixative solution. The fixative used was FAA (Formalin-5ml + Acetic acid-5ml + 70% Ethyl alcohol-90ml) for pharmacognostical study. Left sample were shade dried for preliminary phytochemical test, physiochemical and HPTLC. Results and discussion: Microscopic image showed the presence of normal fruit structure like Epicarp, Mesocarp and Endocarp. The study proved the presence of Alkaloids, Tannins, Saponins and carboxylic acid and HPTLC densitometric graph showed the peaks. Conclusion: These parameters help in the identification and standardization of fruit of Rajakoshataki.

Keywords: Rajakoshataki, Physio-Chemical, Phytochemical, HPTLC, Densitometric

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Anju Balakrishnan, Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Dravya Guna, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Ayurveda, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
Email:
Anju Balakrishnan, Mohammed Faisal, Suchitra Prabhu, Pharmacognostical evaluation of Rajakoshataki (Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb.. J Ayu Int Med Sci. 2022;7(8):18-24.
Available From
https://www.jaims.in/jaims/article/view/1931

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2022-07-27 2022-07-29 2022-08-05 2022-08-12 2022-08-19
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Nil Nil Yes 19%

© 2022by Anju Balakrishnan, Mohammed Faisal, Suchitra Prabhuand Published by Maharshi Charaka Ayurveda Organization. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

India is rich in its natural diversity of plant kingdom. There is no herb devoid of medicinal value. Lack of scientific evidence leads to decline of Ayurvedic treatment modality. But now a days there are high demand for herbal drugs because of the less side effects and high therapeutic efficacy with its easy availability Rajakoshataki (Luffa acutangular (L.) Roxb. Belongs to Cucurbitaceae family and is commonly known as Ridge gourd in English. It is a succulent, trailing, decumbent annual or perennial herb. It climbs by means of laterally spirally coiled, simple or branched tendrils.[1] It is cultivated throughout India and widely used as vegetable crop. In folklore medicine the fruit of Rajakoshataki is widely used in many ailments like jaundice, fever, hyperuricemia[2] etc. Fruits and tender leaves are widely used for therapeutic purpose as well as diet. But adulteration and substitution will cause a barrier for this. Hence this study is an attempt to develop standardization parameters including macroscopy, microscopy, photochemical physiochemical and HPTLC of Rajakoshataki fruit.

Materials and Methods

Drug source: The fruit of Rajakoshataki is collected from local vegetable market of Udupi. The drug is authenticated and standardization is done in the Pharmacognostic lab of SDM center for Research and Allied Sciences, Udupi.

Macroscopy: The external features of the test samples were documented using Canon IXUS digital camera. The macroscopic features were compared to local flora for authentication.

Microscopy: Sample was preserved in fixative solution. The fixative used was FAA (Formalin-5ml + Acetic acid-5ml + 70% Ethyl alcohol-90ml). The materials were left in FAA for more than 48 hours. The preserved specimens were cut into thin transverse section using a sharp blade and the sections were stained with saffranine. Transverse sections were photographed using Zeiss AXIO trinocular microscope attached with Zeiss Axio Cam camera under bright field light. Magnifications of the figures are indicated by the scale-bars.

Physico-chemical standards[3]

The sample is tested for Loss on drying, Total ash, Water soluble ash, Acid insoluble ash, Alcohol

soluble extractive and water soluble extractive as per standard protocol.

Phytochemical study[4]: Alcohol and aqueous extract of the drug was used to check the presence of secondary metabolites like alkaloids, carbohydrates, steroids, saponins, tannins, flavanoids, phenol, coumarins, triterpinoids, carboxylic acid, resin and quinone.

HPTLC[5,6]: One gram of powdered sample of fruit of Luffa acutangula were suspended in 10 ml methanol (99.9%) and kept for cold percolation for 24h and filtered. 3, 6 and 9µl of the above samples were applied on a pre-coated silica gel F254 on aluminum plates to a band width of 7 mm using Linomat 5 TLC applicator. The plate was developed in Chloroform: Hexane: Methanol: Formic acid (6.4: 3.9: 2.0: 0.5). The developed plates were visualized in short UV, long UV and then derivatized with Vanillin sulphuric acid reagent (VSA) and scanned under UV 254nm, 366nm and 620nm. Rf, colour of the spots and densitometric scan were recorded.

Observations and Results

Organoleptic features
Colour: Dark green
Size: 10 to 30 cm
Taste: Sweet - bitter
Odour: Characteristic odour

Macroscopy: Pepo, obovate, having 10 acute lines on it, which is from base to apex of the fruit. Fruit is narrow towards both ends and broader in the middle. Matured fruits are used as natural sponge.

Seed: Ovate to oblong, dorsiventrally flattened, colour chocolate brown to black.

Figure 1: Macroscopy of fruit
jaims_1931_01.JPGRidge guard (Luffa acutangula fruit)

Microscopy: Transverse section of fruit shows all the general microscopic characteristics of fruit. i.e., presence of epicarp, mesocarp and endocarp, which are well differentiated.


Epicarp: It is the outer most layers of fruit made up of thin rectangular cells with a thick cuticle and stomata at regular intervals. In mature fruits there are layers of subepidermal collenchyma.

Mesocarp: It is made up of many layers of thin compactly arranged parenchymatous cells, shows lignified fibers and scleranchymatous cells and layer of lignified cells below epicarp are present in parenchyma. Vascular tissue is also observed in parenchymatous region which is partially covered with lignified fiber. Starch grains are also present. The lignified fibers are scattered in mesocarp.

Endocarp: It is made of simple large polygonal parenchymatous cell which envelops the seeds. These are partially lignified and sclerenchymatous cells are scattered.

Figure 2: Microscopy of fruit of Luffa acutangular
jaims_1931_02.JPGFig 2a. Epicarp and Mesocarp

jaims_1931_03.JPG


Fig 2b. Mesocarp enlarged


jaims_1931_04.JPG

Fig 2c. Stone cells and Sclereids zone

E-epicarp; Chlor–chlorenchyma; Pa-parenchyma; Ph-phloem; SC – stone cells; Scl–sclereids; T–trichomes; VS-vascular strands.


jaims_1931_05.JPG

Fig 2d. Epicarp and mesocarp

jaims_1931_06.JPG

Fig 2e. Scattered vascular bundle

jaims_1931_07.JPG

Fig 2f. Stone cells

jaims_1931_08.JPG

Fig 2g. Lignified cells

jaims_1931_09.JPG

Fig 2h. Vascular strand /Lignified fibres

jaims_1931_10.JPG
Fig 2i. Ground tissue

E-epicarp; F- fibres; Lig.fibres-lignified fibres; Pa-parenchyma; SC – stone cells; VS – vascular strands. VB–vascular bundles


Physico-chemical standards

Table 1: Results of Physico-chemical parameters of fruit of Luffa acutangular.

Parameter Results n = 3 %w/w Avg ± SEM
Loss on drying 30.06 ± 0.00
Total Ash 5.67 ± 0.02
Acid Insoluble Ash 0.56 ± 0.01
Water soluble Ash 5.49 ± 0.01
Alcohol soluble extractive value 7.46 ± 0.01
Water soluble extractive value 40.94 ± 0.05

Table 2: Results of preliminary phytochemical screening of fruit juice of Luffa acutangula

Test Inference
Alkaloid +
Steroid -
Carbohydrate -
Tannin +
Flavanoids -
Saponins +
Terpenoid -
Coumarins -
Phenols -
Carboxylic acid +
Amino acids -
Resin -
Quinone -

(+) – Present; (-) – Negative

jaims_1931_11.JPG

Figure 3: HPTLC photo documentation of methanolic fraction of Luffa acutangula

Solvent system - Chloroform: Hexane: Methanol: Formic acid (6.4:3.9: 2.0: 0.5)

Track 1 – Luffa acutangula – 3µl


Track 2 – Luffa acutangula – 6µl

Track 3 – Luffa acutangula – 9µl

Table 3: Rf values of Luffa acutangula

Short UV Long UV Post derivatisation
- - 0.06 (Brown)
0.09 (Green) - -
- 0.13 (F. green) -
0.16 (Green) - 0.17 (Brown)
0.28 (Green) - -
- 0.30 (F. blue) -
0.36 (Green) 0.36 (F. blue) -
0.45 (Green) - -
- 0.49 (F. blue) -
0.52 (Green) 0.52 (F. pink) -
- 0.54 (F. pink) -
- 0.57 (F. red) -
- 0.68 (F. pink) -
- 0.94 (F. red) -
- 0.96 (F. red) -

*F- fluorescent

Figure 4: Densitometric scan for the methanolic extract of fruit of Luffa acutangula

jaims_1931_12.JPG


jaims_1931_13.JPG

jaims_1931_14.JPG

Discussion

Standardization helps in the authentication of the herbal drug in association with public health issues. It helps to identify the instances where the drug is adulterated/substituted. It ensures the identity and purity of licensed herbal drugs.

Macro-microscopy of the drug brings out the comprehensive identity profile of the

fruit of Rajakoshataki. Loss on drying (30.06 ± 0.00) is used to determine the moisture content of the drug. Total ash value (5.67 ± 0.02) is obtained after complete combustion of drug sample. It is the measure of inorganic impurities in the sample. It gives estimation about the purity and quality of the drug. Acid Insoluble Ash (0.56 ± 0.01) indicates the presence of fine soil and sand particles present in the sample. Water soluble Ash (5.49 ± 0.01) is the part of total ash dissolved by water under specified conditions. It gives the estimation of inorganic contents in the sample. Alcohol soluble extractive value (7.46 ± 0.01) is primarily used for the determination of exhausted or adulterated drugs. It plays an important role in determining the identity and purity of the drug. Water soluble extractive value (40.94 ± 0.05) also plays an important role in the evaluation of crude drug. It indicates the addition of exhausted or adulteration of drugs. The Phytochemical tests indicate the presence of high amount of alkaloids, tannins, saponins and carboxylic acid.

Test drug sample when developed on aluminum plates having media Chloroform: Hexane: Methanol: Formic acid (6.4: 3.9: 2.0: 0.5), 6 peaks were observed on short UV, 10 peaks in long UV and 2 peaks post derivatization with Vanillin sulphuric acid reagent.

Conclusion

Rajakoshataki - Luffa acutangular (L.)Roxb. is a succulent, trailing, decumbent annual or perennial climber which belongs to cucurbitaceae family. It is one of the widely used vegetable crop which is cultivated throughout India. This study is an attempt to develop multidimensional identification characteristics of Rajakoshataki fruit including macroscopic, microscopic, physiochemical, preliminary phytochemical profile and HPTLC.

Reference

1. K Gopalakrishna Bhat, Flora of Udupi, Udupi: Indian Naturalist Publications, , Ed. 1st 2003; P 242.

2. Faisal Mohammed, Ethno botanical survey of certain areas of Udhyavara village of Udupi district wsr to their Taxonomical identification and Medicinal uses, Co investigated by Shrikanth P, Niveditha Shetty, SDM College of Ayurveda, Udupi; P 224.


3. Kokate C K, Purohit A P, Gokhale S B, Pharmacognosy, Pune: Nirali Prakashan, Ed. 31st 2005, P 3-4.

4. Kokate C K, Purohit A P, Gokhale S B, Pharmacognosy, Pune: Nirali Prakashan, Ed. 31st 2005; P 108-109.

5. Kokate C K, Purohit A P, Gokhale S B, Pharmacognosy, Pune: Nirali Prakashan, Ed. 31st 2005; P 114.

6. Kokate C K, Purohit A P, Gokhale S B, Pharmacognosy, Pune: Nirali Prakashan, Ed. 31st 2005; P 115