E-ISSN:2456-3110

Research Article

Prameha

Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences

2022 Volume 7 Number 9 October
Publisherwww.maharshicharaka.in

A comparative clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya in Prameha vis-a-vis Type II Diabetes Mellitus

D Bhat T.1*, Kumar MD S.2
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21760/jaims.7.9.7

1* Tejaswini D Bhat, Final year PG Scholar, Department of PG Studies in Kayachikitsa, Govt. Ayurveda Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

2 Sanjay Kumar MD, Associate Professor, Department of PG Studies in Kayachikitsa, Govt. Ayurveda Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Background: Prameha is a Mutratipravrutta Vyadhi which is characterized by Prabhuta Mutra and Avila Mutra. Prameha is considered as a Daruna Vyadhi as it involves Tridosha, affects Basti which is a Mahamarma, is Anushangi with many Upadrava. Kapha, Meda and Shareera Kleda play an important role in its manifestation. This disease has closer resemblance with Type II Diabetes mellitus. In Ayurveda classical texts, various formulations in the form of Kashaya, Ghritha, Asava and Arishta have been explained in the context of treatment of Prameha. Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya mentioned as Sarvaprameha Hara Yoga in Charaka Samhita and Yogaratnakara respectively are taken up for study in the management of Prameha vis-a-vis Type II Diabetes mellitus. Objective: To compare the efficacy of Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya in Prameha vis-`a-vis Type II Diabetes mellitus. Method: It was a comparative clinical study involving two groups, Group A and Group B, each consisting of 25 patients. For Group A, Darvyadi Kashaya was administered and for Group B, Vidangadi Kashaya was administered for 90 consecutive days. Result: After completion of treatment, it was observed that glycemic control was considerable in both the groups. Darvyadi Kashaya showed slightly better results in Karapada Daha and Prabhuta Mutra at night. In fresh cases, significant glycemic control was observed compared to treated cases in both the groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded from the results that both Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya are equally effective in management of Prameha vis-a-vis Type II Diabetes mellitus.

Keywords: Kleda, Prabhuta Mutra, Abaddha Meda, Bahudrava Shleshma, Insulin, Free Fatty Acids

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Tejaswini D Bhat, Final year PG Scholar, Department of PG Studies in Kayachikitsa, Govt. Ayurveda Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Email:
Tejaswini D Bhat, Sanjay Kumar MD, A comparative clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya in Prameha vis-a-vis Type II Diabetes Mellitus. J Ayu Int Med Sci. 2022;7(9):49-56.
Available From
https://www.jaims.in/jaims/article/view/2075

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2022-08-29 2022-08-31 2022-09-07 2022-09-14 2022-09-21
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Nil Nil Yes 18%

© 2022by Tejaswini D Bhat, Sanjay Kumar MDand Published by Maharshi Charaka Ayurveda Organization. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Prameha is a Santarpanajanya Vyadhi explained in Brihatrayi and is considered one among Ashta Mahagada.[1] In Prameha invariably all Tridosha are involved along with involvement of Meda, Kleda, Rasa, Mamsa, Rakta, Shukra, Lasika and Oja. It is considered as a Chirakaleena Vyadhi as it affects Basti which is a Mahamarma, is Anushangi i.e., which is recurring in nature and associated with multiple Upadrava. Many features of Prameha resemble the features of Diabetes mellitus in terms of Nidana Panchaka. Diabetes mellitus is defined as a metabolic disorder of multiple aetiology characterised by chronic hyperglycaemia with disturbances of carbohydrate, fat and protein metabolism resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or both.[2] Sedentary life style, lack of exercise, faulty food habits and improper medication and urbanization precipitate disease.

As of 2019, globally around 422 million people suffer from Diabetes mellitus and 1.6 million deaths are directly attributed to diabetes each year.[3] Type II Diabetes mellitus accounts for the vast majority (90%) of Diabetes worldwide. In India, the prevalence rate of Diabetes is around 11.4 % in urban area and around 2.9% in rural area. The average prevalence rate of Type II Diabetes mellitus is around 7.5%.

Current guidelines advocate the comprehensive management of Diabetes mellitus including exercise therapy, nutritional therapy, psychosocial care and usage of oral antihyperglycaemic agents such as biguanides, insulin secretagogoues, thiazolidinedions, alpha glucosidase inhibitors and insulin regimen to regulate and maintain glycaemic control.[4]

These therapies aim at lowering the blood sugar levels. Over time, most patients seek for an alternative, natural and safer therapy which help to maintain blood sugar levels and also prevent its progression. Currently, in Ayurveda, for the treatment of Prameha many purificatory methods, herbomineral formulations, single drug formulations and dietary practices are advocated. Darvyadi Kashaya[5] and Vidangadi Kashaya[6] are two such compounds mentioned in the context of Prameha Chikitsa in Charaka Samhita and Yogaratnakara respectively as Sarvapramehahara Yoga.

Thus, with the background of theoretical references and research studies on actions of these drugs, this study is undertaken to compare the efficacy of Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya in the management of Prameha vis-`a-vis Type II Diabetes mellitus.

Objective of the Study

To compare the efficacy of Darvyadi Kashaya with Vidangadi Kashaya in the management of Prameha vis`a vis Type II Diabetes mellitus.

Materials and Methods

The materials used in the study were Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya.

Source of drug and method of preparation

Formulation Darvyadi kashaya mentioned in Charaka Samhita and Vidangadi Kashaya mentioned in Yogaratnakara were specifically prepared and procured from S.N. Pandit and Sons Ayurvedic Co. Pvt. Ltd, Mysuru, (a GMP certified pharmacy) for the purpose of study.

Method of collection of data

a. Study design: A double arm open labelled comparative clinical trial with pre and post test design.

b. Sample size: Study comprised of 55 registered subjects (27 in Group A and 28 in Group B) out of which 5 were drop outs. The study was completed on 50 subjects with 25 in Group A and 25 in Group B

c. Duration of study: 90 days

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subjects of all gender and age group between 30-60 years were included.

2. Subjects with FBS within 126-170mg/dl and or PPBS within 200-300mg/dl were included.

3. Subjects with HbA1c greater than or equal to 6.5 %

4. Subjects with and without signs and symptoms of Prameha vis-`a- vis Type II Diabetes Mellitus were included.

5. Both fresh and treated cases were included. Fresh and treated cases included


a. Freshly detected and untreated cases of Type II Diabetes Mellitus.

b. Established and treated cases of Type II Diabetes Mellitus with chronicity below 5 years who voluntarily discontinue the on-going treatment. Flush out period of 3 days was given before the case is taken.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects with history of Diabetes Mellitus associated with complications like diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, infectious wounds, and gangrene and foot ulcers were excluded.

2. Patients with other systemic disorders like congestive cardiac failure, chronic renal failure, uncontrolled hypertension, other endocrinal diseases, infectious conditions and debilitating illness which interfered with the intervention were excluded.

3. Patients of Type II Diabetes Mellitus who were on insulin treatment were excluded.

4. Pregnant and the lactating women were excluded.

5. Subjects on steroids and estrogen replacement therapy were excluded.

Diagnostic Criteria

Based on WHO Guidelines for diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus[11] which included

1. HbA1c greater than or equal to 6.5%

2. Fasting blood sugar level greater than or equal to 126mg/dl

3. Post prandial blood sugar level greater than or equal to 200mg/dl

Assessment Criteria

Primary assessment parameters

1. Fasting blood sugar and post prandial blood sugar was assessed on day 0,16th day, 31st day, 61st day and 91st

2. Hba1c levels of subjects was tested prior and after completion of intervention on day 0 and 91st

3. Urine sugar – Fasting and Post Prandial will be assessed on day 0, 16th day, 31st day,61st day and 91st


Secondary Assessment Parameters: Clinical signs and symptoms in symptomatic patients of Prameha vis-`a-vis Type II Diabetes Mellitus will be assessed using grading score through questionnaire. The following parameters will be considered, graded and scores will be given.

1. Prabhuta Mutrata (day time)

a. Frequency of micturition 3-5 times/day - 0

b. Frequency of micturition -6-8 times/day - 1

c. Frequency of micturition-9-11 times/day - 2

d. Frequency of micturition more than 11 times/day - 3

2. Prabhuta Mutrata (night time)

a. Does not wake up for micturition - 0

b. Wakes up once for micturition - 1

c. Wakes up twice for micturition - 2

d. Wakes up more than 2 times for micturition - 3

3. Kshutadhikya (polyphagia)

a. Feels hunger at next Annakala only - 1

b. Feels hunger for once in between Annakala - 2

c. Feels hunger for more than twice in between Annakala - 3

d. Feels hunger always - 4

4. Pipasa Adhikya (polydypsia)

a. Frequency of consumption of water due to thirst – 4-6 times/day - 0

b. Frequency of consumption of water due to thirst-7-9 times/day - 1

c. Frequency of consumption of water due to thirst10-12times/day - 2

d. Frequency of consumption of water due to thirst more than 12 times/day - 3

5. Dourbalya (weakness)

a. Can do routine physical activities - 0

b. Can do moderate physical activities with difficulty - 1

c. Can do only mild physical activities with difficulty - 2

d. Cannot even do mild physical activities - 3


6. Karapada Daha (burning sensation of hands and feet)

a. No burning sensation in feet and/or hands - 0

b. Mild burning sensation in feet and/or hands - 1

c. Moderate burning sensation in feet and/or hands - 2

d. Severe burning sensation in feet and/or hands - 3

7. Gurugatrata (feeling of heaviness)

a. No feeling of heaviness of the body - 0

b. Mild feeling of heaviness of the body which does not hamper routine work - 1

c. Moderate feeling of heaviness of the body which hampers routine work occasionally - 2

d. Severe feeling of heaviness of the body which hampers routine work always - 3

Assessment Schedule
1.Fasting blood sugar and post prandial blood sugar was assessed on day 0, 16th day, 31st day, 61st day and 91st

2. HbA1c levels of subjects was tested prior and after completion of intervention on day 0 and 91st

3. Urine sugar - Fasting and Post Prandial was assessed on day 0, 16th day, 31stday, 61st day and 91st day

Statistical Methods: Chi square test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, independent t test and descriptive statistics were applied and was analysed using SPSS for windows software.

Intervention
Group A: Oral administration of 25ml of Darvyadi Kashaya with equal quantity of warm water in two equally divided doses during morning and night before food for 90 consecutive days of intervention.

Group B: Internal administration of 25ml of Vidangadi Kashaya with equal quantity of warm water in two equally divided doses during morning and night before food for 90 consecutive days of intervention.

Observations

In the present study it was observed that Prameha was common in the age

group of 41-50 years (43.6%), males (72.7%) were more affected than females (27.3%), it had higher incidence in people with desk jobs (26.7%) and homemakers (24.4%) followed by farmers (17.8%) and laborers (17.8%). Incidence was more in lower middleclass population (82.20%) and in people with mixed diet (74.5%), irregular dietary habits (56.3%), intake of milk, curd and its products (68.6%). It was observed that improper lifestyle habits such as lack of exercise (90.9%), habit of daysleep (61.8%) and influence of psychological factors such as stress, anger may have precipitated the disease. Increased BMI and positive family history which are considered as risk factors were also observed in these subjects. Maximum patients in the study were freshly treated cases with a history of Diabetes mellitus since 1-2 years.

Results

A total of 55 subjects were registered for the study, there were 5 dropouts. The results were obtained by assessing 50 subjects who have completed the study.

Result on Prabhuta Mutrata (Daytime)

Highly stastically significant reduction in frequency of micturition was observed in both Darvyadi kashaya group with p= 0.000 and Vidangadi kashaya group with p= 0.000. The change in frequency of micturition in between the two groups was statistically non-significant with a P value 0.556.

Result on Prabhuta Mutrata (night time)

Highly stastically significant reduction in frequency of micturition (night time) was observed in both Darvyadi kashaya group with p= 0.000 and Vidangadi kashaya group with p= 0.000. The change in frequency of micturition in between the two groups was statistically significant with a P value 0.040.

Result on Kshutadhikhya: Highly significant reduction in Kshutadhikhya was observed in both Darvyadi kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. In between the groups, non-significant result was obtained with p= 0.302.

Result on Pipasadhikhya: Significant reduction in Pipasadhikhya was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi


Kashaya group with p= 0.000. Non-significant result with p value 0.317 was obtained in between the groups.

Result on Dourbalya: Highly significant reduction in Dourbalya was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. On comparing the effect in between the groups, non-significant result was obtained with p= 0.428.

Result on Gurugatrata: Highly significant reduction in Gurugatrata was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. The effect in between the groups on parameter Gurugatrata, non-significant result was obtained with p= 0.077.

Result on Karapada Daha

Significant reduction in Karapada Daha was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0. 000. There was significant difference observed between the groups with p= 0.020.

Result on Fasting blood sugar (FBS)

Significant reduction in FBS was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. In between the groups, no significant difference was obtained with p= 0.136.

Result on Post prandial blood sugar (PPBS)

Highly statistically significant reduction in PPBS was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. However, on comparing the effect in between the groups, no significant difference was obtained with p= 0.458.

Result on Fasting urine sugar (FUS)

Significant reduction in FUS was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. No significant difference was observed in between the groups with p=0.058.

Result on Postprandial urine sugar (PPUS)

Significant reduction in PPUS was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. However, on comparing the effect in between the groups, no significant difference was obtained with p=0.452.

Result on HbA1c: Significant reduction in HbA1c was observed in both Darvyadi Kashaya group p= 0.000 and Vidangadi Kashaya group with p= 0.000. However, on comparing the effect in between the groups, no significant difference was obtained with p=0.298.

Table 1: Showing results of overall assessment between the groups on Objective parameter

Parameter Fasting blood sugar (FBS) Post Prandial Blood Sugar (PPBS) Fasting Urine Sugar ( FUS) Post Prandial Urine Sugar (PPUS) HbA1c
Groups Trial Control Trial Control Trial Control Trial Control Trial Control
Pre -Mean 3.68 4.96 5.48 5.60 1.76 1.76 1.44 0.28 2.56 2.92
Post-Mean 0.24 0.56 0.20 0.32 0.40 0.76 1.48 0.40 1.84 2.08

Discussion

Prameha is a Mahagada in which Bahudrava Shleshma is Dosha Vishesha and Bahu Abaddha Meda which has similarities with the disease Type II Diabetes mellitus in terms of Nidana Panchaka and Chikitsa. The study reveals that intake of Snigdha, Meda, Guru Ahara which is the prime Nidana for manifestation of Prameha can be understood in terms of high calorie, high glycemic index and high fat diet. The combination of Aharaja Nidana and Viharaja Nidana play a role in manifestation and current lifestyle habits which include the sedentary habit with intake of junk food, fried foods justify the same.

Majority of the subjects had slightly higher BMI and could be categorized as overweight which acts as a major risk factor for manifestation of Diabetes mellitus. Thus, it can be inferred that obese or overweight individuals have a higher risk of developing Diabetes mellitus. Abaddha Meda which is circulating in the Shareera and manifests Prameha can be understood in terms of circulating free fatty acids. In pathogenesis of Prameha, Kapha is the main Dosha and Meda and Kleda are the main Dushya involved. Gradually all the other Dushya also get involved and leads to Dhatu Kshaya. Hence, in management of Prameha, therapeutics having Kapha Meda Hara, Kleda Shoshana, Agni Deepana and Rasayana effect have to be selected.

Probable mode of action of Darvyadi Kashaya

Darvyadi Kashaya contains Darvi (Daruharidra), Devadaru, Musta and Triphala.


Darvi is having Tiktarasa, Laghu Guna with Ushna Veerya and Katu Vipaka and is one among Lekhaneeya Gana Dravya. It has the action of Kapha Pitta Shamana.[7] Darvi Kashaya is mentioned as the choice of drug in Pishta Meha. Musta[8] is also having Tikta, Kashaya, Katu Rasa with Laghu Ruksha Guna, Katu Vipaka and Sheeta Veerya. It is also Pitta Kapha Shamaka and is included in Lekhaniya Varga and Trushnanigrahana Varga in Charaka Samhita. Musta is Deepana, Pachana and is having Dahahara action.

Extract of Cyperus rotundus rhizomes have proven to have antidiabetic properties by increasing antioxidant process, stimulating insulin release, blocking glucagon secretion from βcells. It has also succeeded to normalize lipid levels and improve liver and kidney functions.[9]

Triphala is having Laghu Ruksha Guna and is Tridosha Shamaka. It has Chakshushya, Medohara, Vatanulomana, Dahahara and Rasayana action. Haritaki (Terminlaia chebula) is proven of having immediate hypoglycemic activity and long-term administration led to significant decrease in fasting glucose levels suggesting a novel insulin secretagogue like action. Chronic administration of Amalaki led to fall in fasting blood glucose levels, increase in weight and suggests a novel insulin sensitizing effect. Vibhitaki has an effect on post prandial blood glucose levels by decreasing intestinal glucose absorption.[10]

Considering the properties and actions of individual drugs, it can be considered that Darvyadi Kashaya is having Tikta, Kashaya Katu Rasa with Laghu Ruksha Guna and Ushna Veerya.

In the pathogenesis of Prameha, increased Kleda leading to Prabhuta Mutrata is the cardinal feature. Darvyadi Kashaya by virtue of its Tikta, Kashaya and Katu Rasa does Kleda Shoshana, Lekhana, and also Shoshana of Meda, Vasa, Majja, Lasika and Sweda. By Laghu Ruksha Guna and Ushna Veerya it does Kapha Shamana which is the Pradhana Dosha. Devadaru, Musta and Triphala are having Lekhana and Medohara Karma which help in reducing Meda and Kapha. Research studies have shown that these drugs have antihyperlipidemic activity. Musta may also reduce Trishna which is a major feature in Prameha. Triphala by its Rasayana effect reduces Dourbalya and provides Bala to Shareera . It is also helpful in reducing the symptoms

such as Klaibya and Karapada Daha. Triphala is proven to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulating effect and clinical studies have shown that it is also helpful in sexual dysfunction, diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy conditions. Most of the drugs are having Pramehahara as direct indication therefore it can be considered as Vyadhi Pratyanika Dravya. Even research studies show that the drugs are having antihyperglycemic effect.

Probable mode of action of Vidangadi Kashaya

Vidangadi Kashaya contains Vidanga, Nagara, Haridra, Gokshura and Yashtimadhu. Vidanga has Katu, Kashaya Rasa with Laghu, Ruksha, Teekshna Guna and Ushna Virya. It is Kaphavatahara with Deepana, Medohara and Mehahara Karma.[11] Tannins present in Embelia ribes have shown antihyperglycemic action by increasing insulin assisted glucose uptake, which indicates there was increase in insulin sensitivity. Tannins and saponins of Embelia ribes play a major role in reducing oxidative stress associated with diabetes probably by scavenging free radicals and preventing depletion of endogenous antioxidant.[12]

Nagara[13] has Katu Rasa, Laghu Snigdha Guna, Ushna Veerya, Madhura Vipaka. It is Vatakaphahara and is considered under Trishna Nigrahana Varga. It is having Deepana, Pachana and Vrishya Karma. Ginger according to research studies exerts its antidiabetic effects through restorative effects on pancreatic β cells, increasing insulin sensitivity, peripheral utilization of glucose. Other mechanisms include inhibition of hepatic glucose production and inhibition of carbohydrate metabolism.[14]

Haridra[15] has Tikta, Katu Rasa with Ruksha Laghu Guna and Katu Vipaka and Ushna Veerya. It is Kapha Pitta Shamaka and is considered as Agrya for Prameha. It is included under Lekhaneya Varga. Curcumin, one of the main constituents of Haridra has high levels of polyphenols and strong antioxidant activity. Curcumin can promote AMPK activation and glucose uptake with increased insulin sensitivity in muscle cells.[16]

Yashtimadhu[17] has Madhura Rasa, Guru Snigdha Guna, Madhura Vipaka and Sheeta Veerya. It is having Vata Pitta Shamaka Karma and is mentioned in Mutra Virajaneeya Varga. It is Balya and Trishnahara. Glycyrrhiza glabra extract shows inhibition of α glucosidase and α amylase inhibitory activity leading to reduction in disaccharide


hydrolysis which has beneficial effect on glycemic index control and can reduce the incidence of post prandial hyperglycemia.[18]

Gokshura[19] has Madhura Rasa, Guru Snigdha Guna and Ushna Veerya and Madhura Vipaka. It is Tridosha Shamaka and is included in Mutravirechaniya Varga. It has Basti Shodhaka, Balya, Deepana, Pramehahara action. Tribulus terrestris can significantly inhibit gluconeogenesis, influence glycometabolism and reduce blood sugar levels. Saponins present in Tribulus terrestris show reduction in serum glucose and inhibit hepatic gluconeogenesis. It also delays the absorption of glucose by inhibiting α glucosidase in small intestine and lowering post prandial glucose.[20]

Considering the properties and actions of individual drugs, it can be considered that Vidangadi Kashaya is Katu, Kashaya Rasa, Ushna Veerya and Katu Vipaka with Medohara, Lekhana and Vata Kaphahara properties.

In Prameha pathogenesis, Vidanga and Haridra by Medohara and Lekhana Karma and also by Tikta, Katu Rasa may reduce Meda, Kapha and Kleda. Nagara and Yashtimadhu by virtue of Trishnanigraha Karma may reduce the symptoms of Pipasadhikyata. Gokshura by virtue of its Basti Shodhana effect may remove the Dosha and Dushya which have taken Sthana Samsharaya in Basti. Yashtimadhu by virtue of its Mutravirajaneeya Karma may be helpful in Pittaja Prameha wherein there are changes in color of urine.

Vidangadi Kashaya may be beneficial in Sthoola Pramehi as Vidanga and Haridra both have Lekhana and Medohara Karma and studies have shown that they have antihyperlipidemic action by increasing levels of leptin and adiponectin and thus reducing the circulating free fatty acids. The drugs such as Haridra and Vidanga are having direct indication in Prameha and researches have also proven that all the drugs have antihyperglycemic activity, anti-oxidant activity and anti-inflammatory activity.

Conclusion

Prameha is one among Ashta Mahagada which involves Tridosha and Dushya such as Meda, Kleda, Mamsa, Rasa, Rakta, Vasa, Lasika, Shukra and Oja and presents with Prabhuta Avila Mutrata and Sarvadaihika Lakshana. The disease has resemblance with Type II Diabetes

mellitus. Group A and Group B showed statistically significant result with no difference in between the groups on subjective parameters such as Prabhuta Mutrata (Daytime), Kshutadhikhya, Pipasadhikhya, Gurugatarata and Dourbalya with p< 0.001. Though both the groups showed significant result on the symptom Prabhuta Mutrata (night) there was significant difference in results between the groups with p= 0.040. On the parameter, Karapada Daha, both the groups showed significant result, however in between the groups significant difference was obtained with p= 0.020. Both the groups showed statistically significant result without difference in between the groups on objective parameters. Considering the above facts, it can be concluded that both Darvyadi Kashaya and Vidangadi Kashaya have statistical and clinical significance and are equally effective in management of Prameha vis-a-vis Type II Diabetes Mellitus.

Reference

1. Acharya J T, editor, 2016, Nibandhasangraha commentary of Sri Dalhanaacharya on Sushruta Samhita, Sushruta Sutrasthana; Avaraneeyadhyaya: chapter 33, verse3-4. Varanasi: Chaukamba Sanskrit Sansthan, 2017; p144

2. Ramachandran A, Snehalata C.Epidemology and Basic considerations of Diabetes.In: Munjal YP.(Ed.) API Textbook of Medicine.9thed,.Mumbai: Association of physicians of India; 2012. p.32

3. World Health Organization. Diabetes[Internet]. Geneva: 2019. Availabe URL https://www.who.int/health-topics/diabete

4. Powers Alvis C,et,al..Diabetes Mellitus:Mangement and Therapies.In: Fauci S, Hauser,Longo,Jameson,Losalzo Kasper,etal,.(Ed.) Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine.20th ed,. United States of America:Mgraw- Hill education;2016.p.2860

5. Acharya Y T, editor, 2015, Ayurvedadipika Commentary of Sri Cakrapanidatta on Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Chikitsa sthana; Prameha chikitsa adhyaya : chapter 6, verse 26. Varanasi: Chaukhamba orientalia, 2015; p.447

6. Brahmashankar B, editor, 2011, Vidyotini commentary on Yogaratnakara, Prameha Chikitsa Adhyaya: verse 2.Varanasi: Choukamba Orientalia, 2011;p566


7. Hegde.P.L, A Harini, editor 2019,A Textbook of Dravyaguna vijnana, chapter 35(B).Vol2. Varanasi Chaukamba Sanskrit sansthana, 2019; p 344-353

8. Hegde.P.L, A Harini, editor 2019,A Textbook of Dravyaguna vijnana, Chapter 64.Vol2. Varanasi Chaukamba Sanskrit sansthana, 2019; p 590-597 363.

9. Singh, P., Khosa, R. L., Mishra, G., & Jha, K. K. (2015). Antidiabetic activity of ethanolic extract of Cyperus rotundus rhizomes in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 7(4), 289–29

10. Prativadibhayankaram VS, Malhotra S, Pandhi P, Singh A. Anti-diabetic Activity of Triphala Fruit Extracts, Individually and in Combination, in Rat Model of Insulin Resistance. Natural Product Communications. February 2008. doi:10.1177/1934578X0800300230

11. Hegde.P.L, A Harini, editor 2019,A Textbook of Dravyaguna vijnana, Chapter 101.Vol2. Varanasi Chaukamba Sanskrit sansthana, 2019; p 887-894 365.

12. Durg, S., Veerapur, V. P., Neelima, S., & Dhadde, S. B. (2017). Antidiabetic activity of Embelia ribes, embelin and its derivatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 86, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.12.001

13. Hegde.P.L, A Harini, editor 2019,A Textbook of Dravyaguna vijnana, Chapter 7 Vol2. Varanasi Chaukamba Sanskrit sansthana, 2019; p 60-71 371.

14. Rani, M. P., Krishna, M. S., Padmakumari, K. P., Raghu, K. G., & Sundaresan, A. (2012). Zingiber officinae extract exhibits antidiabetic potential via modulating glucose uptake, protein glycation and inhibiting adipocyte differentiation: an in vitro study. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 92(9), 1948–1955

15. Hegde.P.L, A Harini, editor 2019,A Textbook of Dravyaguna vijnana, Chapter 35/A.Vol2. Varanasi Chaukamba Sanskrit sansthana, 2019; p 333-343

16. Den Hartogh, D. J., Gabriel, A., & Tsiani, E. (2020). Antidiabetic Properties of Curcumin I: Evidence from In Vitro Studies. Nutrients, 12(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010118

17. Hegde.P.L, A Harini, editor 2019,A Textbook of Dravyaguna vijnana, Chapter 35/A.Vol2. Varanasi Chaukamba Sanskrit sansthana, 2019; p 903-910 369.

18. Karthikeson.P.S, T. laxmi,(2017). Anti-Diabetic Activity of Glycyrrhiza glabra - An In vitro Study. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 44(1), Article No. 22, Pages: 80- 81

19. Hegde.P.L, A Harini, editor 2019,A Textbook of Dravyaguna vijnana, Chapter 32 Vol2. Varanasi Chaukamba Sanskrit sansthana, 2019; p 300-308 373.

20. Shaibany.A, et al (2015). Anti-hyperglycaemic Activity of Tribulus terrestris L Aerial Part Extract in Glucose-loaded Normal Rabbits. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research December 2015; 14 (12): 2263-2268