The anti-inflammatory, muscle-relaxing, and Vatahara (Vata-pacifying) properties of Shaliparnyadi Yusha have long been recognized in Ayurvedic medicine. In the context of Ayurvedic formulations, Yusha refers to a light, easily digestible decoction or soup prepared from various medicinal herbs, often used for therapeutic purposes. The primary characteristics of Yusha lie in its ability to balance the doshas, particularly Vata and Pitta, while being nourishing and easy on digestion. In the case of Shaliparnyadi Yusha, its composition includes herbs like Shaliparni (Desmodium gangeticum), which possess anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and muscle-relaxing properties. The lightness (Laghu Guna) and digestive ease (Mridu Agni Dipana) of Yusha make it an ideal choice for pregnant women, particularly those in the second and third trimester, when the digestive system may be more sensitive. Additionally, Yusha provides hydration, which helps maintain proper fluid balance in the body, supporting the growing needs of both the mother and the fetus. Its soothing nature helps relieve musculoskeletal discomfort, including conditions like Garbhini Parshwagraha, by pacifying aggravated Vata, promoting muscle relaxation, and reducing rigidity in the flanksandlowerback.
In this study, Shaliparnyadi Yusha demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing both flank rigidity and lower back pain, likely due to its ability to restore Vata balance and reduce inflammation. These findings are consistent with previous studies which suggest that Shaliparni and related herbs possess analgesic properties beneficial for musculoskeletal pain. The study's results corroborate the ancient Ayurvedic wisdom found in texts such as Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita, which emphasize the importance of Vata management during pregnancy to prevent conditions like Parshwagraha. By providing safe and effective relief without adverse effects, Shaliparnyadi Yusha offers a viable alternative to allopathic interventions for managing pregnancy-related back pain.
Conclusion
Shaliparnyadi Yusha proved to be effective in managing the symptoms of Garbhini Parshwagraha and associated lower back pain, with significant improvements observed in both pain relief and mobility.
Its use during pregnancy is safe, with no reported adverse effects, and offers a holistic approach to managing discomfort in pregnant women. Future studies could explore its long-term effects and potential benefits in other pregnancy-related complications.
References
1. Charaka Samhita, Sharira Sthana, Chapter 8, Verse 32.
2. Sushruta Samhita, Sutrasthana, Chapter 15, Verse 14.
3. Ashtanga Hridaya, Sharira Sthana, Chapter 1, Verse 49.
4. Bhaishajya Ratnavali, Prasuti Roga Chikitsa, 34/46-48.
5. Bhavamishra, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu, Chapter 2, Shaka Varga, Verse 22.
6. Vagbhata, Ashtanga Sangraha, Uttara Tantra, Chapter 32, Verse 10.
7. Sushruta Samhita, Sharira Sthana, Chapter 3, Verse 18.
8. Charaka Samhita, Sutra Sthana, Chapter 13, Verse 12.
9. Chakradatta, Vatavyadhi Chikitsa, Chapter 22, Verse 18.
10. Kashyapa Samhita, Khilasthana, Chapter 18, Verse 24.
11. Harita Samhita, Tridosha Chikitsa, Chapter 11, Verse 5.
12. Bhela Samhita, Vata Vyadhi Chikitsa, Chapter 10, Verse 45.
13. Yogaratnakara, Prasuti Tantra, Chapter 3, Verse 62.
14. Sharangadhara Samhita, Madhyama Khanda, Chapter 7, Verse 106.
15. Vangasena Samhita, Prasuti Tantra, Chapter 12, Verse 32.
16. Franklin ME, Conner-Kerr T. An analysis of posture and back pain in the first and third trimester of pregnancy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(3):133-8.
17. MacEvilly M, Buggy D. Back pain and pregnancy: A review. Pain. 1996;64(3):405-14.
18. Wu WH, Meijer OG, Bruijn SM, et al. Gait in pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: Amplitudes, timing, and coordination of horizontal trunk rotations. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(9):1160-9.
19. Sills ES, Genton MG. Relaxin and its role in pregnancy-related lower back pain. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998;53(4):228-32.
20. Ostgaard HC, Zetherstrom G, Roos-Hansson E, Svanberg B. Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine. 1994;19(8):894-900.