E-ISSN:2456-3110

Research Article

Pulmonary Eosinophilia

Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences

2024 Volume 9 Number 9 SEPTEMBER
Publisherwww.maharshicharaka.in

Efficacy of Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha in the management of Vataja Kasa w.s.r. to Pulmonary Eosinophilia - An Open Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Manjushri P1*, Gopalakrishna G2
DOI:10.21760/jaims.9.9.3

1* Manjushri P, Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Pg Studies in Kayachikitsa, Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

2 Gopalakrishna G, Professor and HOD, Department of PG Studies in Kayachikitsa, Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Background: Vataja Kasa (cough caused by Vata Dosha) occurs due to Pranavaha Srotodushti (causes of deformity in channels of respiratory system) characterized by dry paroxysmal cough that resembles Pulmonary eosinophilia (PE) with an elevated Absolute eosinophilic count (AEC) and eosinophilic lung infiltration. Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha is mentioned in Ayurveda classics under the context of Kasa (cough). The current study was carried out to assess its efficacy based on literary indications and the need for more potent medications to treat Vataja Kasa.

Aim: Evaluation of the efficacy of Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha in the management of Vataja Kasa.

Materials and Methods: A randomized, open label, parallel group, active controlled pre and post test clinical study was conducted comprising of 30 subjects. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups, subjects of Group A received Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha 5g BD and subjects of Group B received Vidangadi Churna 5g BD for 30 days. AEC and Signs & symptoms of Vataja Kasa were assessed before (0th day) and after treatment (30th day), after follow up (45th day). The data obtained were recorded, tabulated and statistically analyzed using Unpaired t test, Paired t Test, Mann Whitney U Test, Wilcoxon Signed rank test.

Results: Analysis of the data within groups showed statistically highly significant (p<0.01) results and between the groups analysis showed statistically non-significant (p>0.05) results in reducing AEC and signs & symptoms of Vataja Kasa suggesting almost similar action of both drugs.

Conclusion: It can be inferred that Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha is as efficient as Vidangadi Churna in the management of Vataja Kasa.

Keywords: Vataja Kasa, Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha, Pulmonary Eosinophilia, AEC

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Manjushri P, Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Pg Studies in Kayachikitsa, Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Email:
Manjushri P, Gopalakrishna G, Efficacy of Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha in the management of Vataja Kasa w.s.r. to Pulmonary Eosinophilia - An Open Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Ayu Int Med Sci. 2024;9(9):15-23.
Available From
https://jaims.in/jaims/article/view/3669

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2024-08-15 2024-08-26 2024-09-05 2024-09-15 2024-09-24
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None Nil Yes 13.22

© 2024by Manjushri P, Gopalakrishna Gand Published by Maharshi Charaka Ayurveda Organization. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Pulmonary Eosinophilia is characterized by Pulmonary infiltration with a predominant eosinophilic exudate, an allergic and inflammatory hyper-response, accompanied by a significant rise in the peripheral eosinophilic count.Dry Paroxysmal cough, chest pain, malaise commonly seen in PE cases.[1]

Elevated levels of AEC is a pre-requisite for determining Pulmonary eosinophilia. Kasa (cough) is a Pranavaha Sroto (channels of respiratory system) disease affecting Prana & Udana Vayu (types of Vata Dosha). Vataja Kasa (cough caused by Vata Dosha) a type of Kasa mainly characterized by Shushka Kasa (Dry cough), Prasakta Kasa Vega (Paroxysmal Cough) and Hrit Shula (chest pain), Shira Shula (Headache), Swarabheda (Hoarseness of voice).[2] Acharyas mentioned the causes of Kasa as Dhumopaghata (inhalation of smoke) and Raja Sevana[3] (inhalation of dust) which holds good even today. Due to industrialization and urbanization there is an increased environmental pollution which is a major cause for respiratory disorders. As per recent data, in 2019, chronic respiratory diseases were the third leading cause of death responsible for 4.0 million deaths with a prevalence of 454.6 million cases globally.[4]

Many medications like NSAID, systemic antibiotics, most specifically nitrofurantoin and various, diverse environmental exposures such as particulate metals, scorpion stings, and inhalational drugs of abuse cause pulmonary eosinophilia.[5] ICD -10-CM J82 is the specific code indicates the diagnosis of PE.[6]

In the contemporary science the acute treatment for PE includes Corticosteroids, Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and Bronchodilators.[5] Side effects of these medications include headache, joint pain, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. Despite of this, relapse occurs in many individuals. So, there is a limitation to the administration of these medications. In absence of successful treatment, this can lead to progressive pulmonary damage. Though Kasa appears to be simple disease, it may end up in poor prognostic condition if not managed properly. Thus, there is a demand for better management of PE through Ayurveda. Study was taken up to evaluate and compare efficacy of Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha with proven drug Vidangadi Churna.

Aim and Objectives

Aim: Evaluation of the efficacy of Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha in the management of Vataja Kasa

Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha and Vidangadi Churna in the management of Vataja Kasa on the basis of improvement in signs and symptoms of Vataja Kasa and AEC grade.

Materials and Methods

Study design

A randomized, open labelled, parallel group, active controlled pre and post-test clinical study.

Study Setting and Ethics

The Study has been carried out at Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science and Research hospital, Bengaluru. The participants were recruited from May 2022 to November 2022.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the SSIEC, Bengaluru with SSIEC protocol number: SSIEC/183/2021. The trial was registered prospectively in CTRI on 22/06/2022 with CTRI number CTRI/2022/06/043421.

Drug source, collection, preparation

Trial drug Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha was manufactured by GMP certified Kumar Ayurveda Ashrama, Bengaluru with Batch No. 136 was obtained for the study. Control drug Vidangadi Churna ingredients were procured from Amrith Kesari Depot, Bengaluru, authenticated by the Dept of Dravyaguna and fine powder manufactured in Dept. of RSBK of the institution. Treatment protocol used in study is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Showing Intervention of Trial and Control group

FeaturesTrial Group AControl Group B
Sample size1515
InterventionVyaghriharitaki Avaleha[7]Vidangadi Churna[8]
AnupanaHot waterHot water
Dosage5g BID5g BID
Time of AdministrationOne Hour Before FoodAfter Food
Trial period30days30days
Follow up15 days15 days
Total duration45 days45 days

Study Participants

Total of thirty subjects, fulfilling selection criteria who gave written informed consent were enrolled for present study, from Outpatient & In-patient department of institution. Participants were allocated to Group A and B using lottery method in ratio of 1:1. All subjects involved in study were ensured that they have taken medicine in prescribed dosage and follow-up was ensured through telephonic contacts.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects aged between 21 to 60 years having dry cough with three or more classical signs & symptoms of Vataja Kasa.

AEC from 500 cells/cu mm to 2500 cells/cu mm and willing to participate with written informed consent were included for clinical trial.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who were diagnosed with other Respiratory diseases like Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Bronchial Asthma, Pneumonia, Pleurisy, CA Bronchus, Emphysema and Covid-19 cases. Subjects with uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus Type I & II and Hypertension. Pregnant and Lactating women were excluded.

Outcomes

Primary outcome measure was reduction in AEC count assessed on baseline, after treatment (30th day) and after follow-up on 45th day. Secondary outcome was reduction in signs and symptoms of Vataja Kasa which were assessed on 0th day, 15th day, 30th day, and 45th day based on gradings from 0-4.

Sample Size

The sample size was calculated based on standard deviation of previous study with 95% confidence interval, and 80% power using formula 2 (SD)2 X (Zb2+Z1a2)/d2 . It was estimated to be 38 samples in each group, total of 76. Since, study duration was of short period, Study sample was limited to 30 subjects.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis of recorded data was done using IBM SPSS windows version 26 and Sigma stat version 3.1.

For assessment of primary outcome AEC Paired t-test, Repeated measures ANOVA test for within group and Unpaired t-test for between groups were applied. For the assessment of secondary outcomes signs & symptoms of Vataja Kasa Wilcoxon signed rank test (W), Friedman’s test (Fr) for within the group and Mann Whitney U test (U) for between the groups were applied. The confidence level was set at 95%, the corresponding P value was noted, and obtained results were interpreted as nonsignificant (P > 0.05), significant (P < 0.05), and highly significant (P < 0.01).

To ascertain whether the statistical analysis correlates with clinical improvement, Effect size determination was carried out for all the subjective, objective parameters and interpreted as

Nil-0, Very Small<0.1, Small- 0.1 to <0.3, Medium- 0.3 to 0.5, Large >0.5 to 0.8,

Very Large >0.8 for between the groups.

Nil-0, Small- 0.1, Medium- 0.3, Large- 0.5 for within the groups.

Observations and Results

Out of 32 subjects, there were 2 dropouts (1 from each group), both lost to follow-up. Hence the study was completed over 30 subjects (Figure 1).

jaims_3669_01.JPG


Demographic profile of study participants:

It was observed that majority of subjects were from the age group of 51-60 years (40%), Female gender (60%), having occupation of housewife (33.3%). 56.6% participants were from Sadharana Desha following vegetarian diet, 70% of the subjects were addicted to Tea, 50% to Coffee, 76.6% subjects were accustomed to moderately active lifestyle. 90% of subjects did not have family history, 86.6% had intake of dry food articles, 83.3% had inhalation of dust, 73.3% inhalation of smoke as etiological factors. (Table 2, Table 3, Figure 2)

Table 2: Demographic data of patients

ParametersGroup AGroup B
Age group (in years)
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
2 (13.3%)
6 (40%)
1 (6.6%)
6 (40%)
1 (6.6%)
4 (26.6%)
4 (26.6%)
6 (40%)
Gender
Male
Female
6 (40%)
9 (60%)
6 (40%)
9 (60%)
Marital status
Married
Unmarried
12 (80%)
3 (20%)
14 (93.3%)
1 (6.6%)
Occupation
Housewife
Self-employed
Employed for salary
Student
Retired
3 (20%)
4 (26.6%)
3 (20%)
2 (13.3%)
3 (20%)
7 (46.6%)
2 (13.3%)
3 (20%)
1 (6.6%)
2 (13.3%)
Educational qualification
Primary education
Secondary education
Higher secondary education
Graduate
Postgraduate
Illiterate
1 (6.6%)
3 (20%)
2 (13.3%)
7 (46.6%)
2 (13.3%)
0 (0%)
2 (13.3%)
0 (0%)
1 (6.6%)
10 (66.6%)
1 (6.6%)
1 (6.6%)
Socio-economic status
Upper middle class
Middle class
Lower middle class
Upper class
5 (33.3%)
9 (60%)
0 (0%)
1 (6.6%)
6 (40%)
6 (40%)
0 (0%)
3 (20%)
Lifestyle
Sedentary
Moderately active
Highly active
0 (0%)
13 (86.6%)
3 (20%)
5 (33.3%)
10 (66.6%)
0 (0%)
Diet
Vegetarian
Mixed
9 (60%)
6 (40%)
8 (53.3%)
7 (46.6%)
Habits and addiction
Tea
Coffee
Cold drinks
Smoking
Alcohol
Tobacco
10 (66.6%)
8 (53.3%)
1 (6.6%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
1 (6.6%)
11 (73.3%)
7 (46.6%)
1 (6.6%)
0 (0%)
1 (6.6%)
0 (0%)
Prakruti
Vata-Pittala
Pitta-Shleshmala
Shleshma-Pittala
Vata-Shleshmala
5 (33.3%)
5 (33.3%)
0 (0%)
5 (33.3%)
9 (60%)
4 (26.6%)
2 (13.3%)
0 (0%)

Table 3: Incidence of Etiological factors

Etiological factorsGroup AGroup B
Ruksha15 (100%)12 (80%)
Alpa7 (46.6%)12 (80%)
Sheeta12 (80%)9 (60%)
Pramita3 (20%)7 (46.6%)
Kashaya1 (6.6%)0 (0%)
Anashana2 (13.3%)5 (33.3%)
Dhumopaghata11 (73.3%)11 (73.3%)
Bhojana Vimargagatva2 (13.3%)2 (13.3%)
Rajah Sevana13 (86.6%)13 (86.6%)
Kshavathu Vegadharana2 (13.3%)1 (6.6%)
Ati Vyayama10 (66.6%)6 (40%)

Figure 2: Incidence of causative factors
jaims_3669_02.JPG

Effect of therapy on outcomes within the Group

Primary outcome

Trial drug and Control drug showed statistically highly significant (p<0.01) results in reducing AEC after intervention. In Trial Group, AEC mean reduced from baseline 631.4±114.9 to 512.2±77.4 on 30th day of treatment whereas in Control Group AEC mean reduced from baseline 611.6±101.55 to 483.06±96.85 (30th day) [Table 4]. Trial drug showed statistically significant(p<0.01) results and control drug showed non-significant (p>0.05) results after drug free follow-up (45th day). Effect size calculation shows that there was medium effect band and Large effect band after intervention within trial group & control group respectively, whereas small effect band after drug free follow up in both groups. [Table 4]

Table 4: Effect of therapy on outcomes (within group)

ParametersGroupBaseline (mean ± SD)30th day (mean ± SD)p ValueEffect size
AECA
B
631.4±114.9
611.6±101.55
512.2±77.4
483.06±96.85
0.001
0.000
0.4
0.5
Dry coughA
B
3.0±0.0
2.93±0.25
1.26±0.45
1.00±0.53
0.000
0.000
0.3
0.3
Paroxysmal coughA
B
2.66±0.49
2.58±0.51
0.58±0.513
0.58±0.514
0.002
0.002
1.4
0.4
Chest painA
B
2.33±1.22
2.28±0.48
1.00±0.50
0.57±0.53
0.023
0.014
1.5
2.2
HeadacheA
B
2.42±0.53
2.00±0.63
1.00±0.00
0.54±0.52
0.015
0.004
0.4
0.3
Flanks painA
B
2.41±0.51
2.72±0.46
0.75±0.45
0.63±0.67
0.002
0.003
0.3
0.4
Hoarseness of voiceA
B
2.08±0.51
1.85±0.53
0.16±0.38
0.35±0.49
0.001
0.001
0.2
0.3
Dryness of mouthA
B
2.00±3.00
1.20±0.44
1.00±1.00
0.40±0.54
0.023
0.046
0.6
1.0

Values expressed as mean ± Standard deviation
*analyzed with Paired t test & Wilcoxon signed rank test

Secondary Outcome

Statistically highly significant (p<0.01) results were observed in reduction of signs & symptoms of Vataja Kasa after intervention except symptom Dryness of mouth which showed statistically significant (p<0.01) result on 30th day. Trial drug showed statistically significant (p<0.01) results for all symptoms except Chest pain, Hoarseness of voice and control drug showed non- significant (p>0.05) results on 45th day. In main symptom Dry cough out of 15 participants having Grade 3, 11 got relief (73.3%) and severity reduced to Grade 1 after intervention in both the groups. Paroxysmal cough reduced from Grade 3 to Grade 0 in 8 participants (53.3%). [Table 5]

Effect of therapy on outcomes between the Group

Table 5: Effect of Treatment on Parameters

ParametersGroup AGroup B
Baseline30th dayBaseline30th day
N%N%N%N%
AEC
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
0
15
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
5
10
0
0
0
33.3
66.6
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
5
10
0
0
0
8
7
0
0
0
53.3
46.6
0
0
0
Dry Cough
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
100
0
11
4
0
0
73.3
26.6
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
100
2
11
2
0
13.3
73.3
13.3
0
Paroxysmal cough
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
0
0
4
8
0
0
26.6
53.3
8
7
0
0
53.3
46.6
0
0
3
0
5
7
20
0
33.3
46.6
8
7
0
0
53.3
46.6
0
0
Chest pain
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
9
0
4
2
60
0
26.6
13.3
9
6
0
0
60
40
0
0
8
0
5
2
53.3
0
33.3
13.3
11
4
0
0
73.3
26.6
0
0
Headache
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
8
0
4
3
53.3
0
26.6
20
8
7
0
0
53.3
46.6
0
0
4
2
7
2
26.6
13.3
46.6
13.3
9
6
0
0
60
40
0
0
Flanks pain
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
3
0
7
5
20
0
46.6
33.3
6
9
0
0
40
60
0
0
4
0
3
8
26.6
0
20
53.3
9
5
1
0
60
33.3
6.66
0
Hoarseness of voice
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
3
1
9
2
20
6.66
60
13.3
13
2
0
0
86.6
13.3
0
0
1
3
10
1
6.66
20
66.6
6.66
10
5
0
0
66.6
33.3
0
0
Dryness of mouth
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
7
1
7
0
46.6
6.66
46.6
0
15
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
10
4
1
0
66.6
26.6
6.66
0
13
2
0
0
86.6
13.3
0
0

AEC, signs & symptoms of Vataja Kasa showed statistically non-significant (p>0.05) results on 30th and 45th day of intervention. However, few signs & symptoms like Headache, Dryness of mouth showed significant (p<0.05) result on 30th day, Hoarseness of voice showed significant (p<0.05) result on 45th day. [Table 5]

The effect size calculation shows that there was medium effect band after intervention and small effect band after drug free follow up in both the groups. [Table 6]

Table 6: Effect of therapy on outcomes (between groups)

Parametersp Value (30th day)p Value (45th day)Effect size (30th day, 45th day)
AEC0.3710.7541.07, 0.11
Dry cough0.1630.7320.25, 0.06
Paroxysmal cough1.0000.1400, 0.26
Chest pain0.0790.8050.32, 0.04
Headache0.0410.6380.37, 0.08
Flanks pain0.5180.3140.1, 0.18
Hoarseness of voice0.2840.0110.2,0.46
Dryness of mouth0.0340.0770.38,0.32

*Analyzed using unpaired t test & Mann-Whitney U test

Discussion

Pulmonary Eosinophilia is diagnosed by raised AEC characterized by dry paroxysmal cough which is understood as Vataja Kasa. In this disease, Vata Pradhana Tridosha vitiation is mainly involved. Thus, drugs possessing Tridoshahara (pacifying three regulatory functional factors of body) property would promote Samprapti Vighatana (breaking pathogenesis). Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha consists of Kantakari (Solanum xanthocarpum Sch. & Wendl.), Haritaki (Terminalia chebula Retz.), Shunti (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe), Maricha (Piper nigrum Linn.), Pippali (Piper longum Linn.), Tvak (Cinnamomum zeylanica Blume), Patra (Cinnamomum tamala (Buch.-Ham.) Nees & Eberm.), Ela (Elettaria cardamomum (Linn.) Maton), Nagakeshara (Mesua ferrea Linn.) as ingredients.

Kantakari is Kaphavatahara (pacifying Kapha & Vata Dosha) does the Srotoshodana (clears minute channels), Vatanulomana (regularizing physiologic movement of Vata Dosha) might have helped in removing Sroto Sanga Vimargagamana (obstruction in channels,

deviation from normal movement of Doshas) and is having Anti-inflammatory, Anti-allergic, Anthelmintic, Immunomodulatory activity[9] might have helped in reducing AEC. Haritaki is Tridoshahara, Vatanulomana and is having anti-microbial, anthelminthic property.[10] Shunti, Maricha, Pippali are having Vatakaphahara, Deepana (carminative), Vatanulomana, Amadoshahara (pacifying the state of incomplete transformation of food or Doshas) action and is having anti-inflammatory, anti-tussive property.[11,14] Tvak, Patra are having Kaphavatahara, Kandughna (anti-pruritic), Kantashuddhikara (reduces throat irritation) and is having anti-microbial property.[15,16] Ela Tridoshahara, Kantashuddhikara and anti-inflammatory, anti-tussive property.[17,14] Nagakeshara is Kaphapittahara, carminative and anti-inflammatory properties.[18] These all above properties of drugs might have helped in reducing Absolute Eosinophilic Count.

Majority of drugs having Kasahara (anti-tussive), Vatanulomana, Krimigna (anti-microbial) property, Tikshna Guna (quick acting), and Katu Rasa (pungent taste), Ushna Virya (hot in potency), Madhura(sweet) Vipaka (end stage of digestion) which might have helped to pacify vitiated Vata, Kapha and removes Sanga(obstruction), Vimargagamana (diversion to the flow of contents to improper channels) promotes Vatanulomana.

Thus, helps in Samprapti Vighatana. Vidangadi Churna contains Vidanga (Embelia ribes), Pippali, Nagara (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe), Rasna (Pluchea lanceolata), Hingu (Freula narthax), Saindhava (Rock salt), Bharangi (Clerodendrum serratum), Yava Kshara (Elettaria cardamomum (Linn.) Maton) as ingredients. It is having Katu, Tikta Rasa (bitter taste), Ushna Virya, Laghu (light), Snigdha Guna (unctuousness), Katu Vipaka and Kaphavatahara property. It is also proven to possess all the aspects of Pharmaco-therapeutic effect like anti-inflammatory, anthelminthic, anti-allergic, anti-tussive, anti-histaminic properties.[19] Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha and Vidangadi Churna exhibited statistically significant improvement in reducing primary and secondary outcomes after intervention. Clinically Vidangadi Churna was productive after intervention and Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha was more efficacious after drug free follow up.


Kantashuddhikara property of Tvak, Patra, Ela of Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha might have helped in reducing Hoarseness of voice and its Rasayana (rejuvenative) effect[20] might be contributing to its effectiveness after drug free followup. Diet regimen and lifestyle modification were also advised to follow during the trial period which might have helped in reducing Signs and symptoms. According to studies, elderly age group is more susceptible to get respiratory illness due to declined immune responses with advancing age.[21] Similar observations were made in the study (51-60 years age group with 40%). Maximum participants had causative factors in relation to food habits as intake of food in less quantity, intake of dry & cold food articles, which causes aggravation of Vata Dosha[22] and in external causative factors inhalation of dust and smoke which results in Pranavaha Srotodushti[23] and leads to onset of Vataja Kasa. In majority of subjects the onset of symptoms was seasonal in nature and was aggravated during winter, rainy season and cold weather. The study's limitation is that a large sample size needs to be used in order to extrapolate the treatment adopted. Future research on this topic could potentially be conducted using the IgE parameter in addition to AEC.

Conclusion

According to the outcomes of the present research, Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha and Vidangadi Churna were statistically efficient in reducing AEC and the signs and symptoms of Vataja Kasa. Clinically, Vyaghriharitaki Avaleha was more efficient after drug-free follow-up, though Vidangadi Churna was more productive following intervention. However, to determine which medication is superior, research with a larger sample size can be carried out. The anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, anti-allergic, anti-tussive, and anthelminthic properties of the drugs in these formulations enabled therapy to be effective.

Acknowledgments:

The author would like to express her gratitude to Dr. Neelakanta J Sajjanar, Dr. Sowmyashree UP, Dr. Ravishankar, Dr. Raghavi, Dr. Mandre Jyothirmai, Dr. Ananyalakshmi E, Dr. Vishwash Saxena, Dr. Sarjita Patel for their contribution in Statistics & its interpretation, valuable suggestions and helping in completion of clinical trial.

References

1. Udwadia FE. Eosinophilic Lung Disease and Tropical Pulmonary Eosinophilia. In: Shah N, Anand M P, Billimoria, Munjal, Kamath, Nadkar, et al. editors. API Textbook of Medicine. Volume 1, 8th ed. Mumbai: The Association of Physicians of India; 2008. p. 391-3.
2. Agnivesha, Charaka samhita of Acharya Charaka, Dridhabala Krit, edited by Vaidya Jadavji Trikamji Acharya. Chikitsa Sthana. Ch.18, Ver. 10-13. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Surbharati Prakashan; 2020. p. 540.
3. Sushruta, Susruta Samhita of Susruta, Dalhana krit, edited by Vaidya Jadavji Trikamji Acharya, Uttara tantra. Ch. 52, Ver. 4. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p. 766.
4. Global burden of chronic respiratory diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: an update from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 4]. Available from: https://www.healthdata.org/research-analysis/library/global-burden-chronic-respiratory-diseases-and-risk-factors-1990-2019.
5. Akutotha P, Wechsler ME. Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and Pulmonary Infiltrates with Eosinophilia. In: Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J., editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. Volume 2, Ch. 282, 20th ed. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill companies; 2018.p.1972-6.
6. Diseases of the Eosinophilic pneumonia (M80-M84). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, ICD 10 volume 1 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2016. [cited 2020 Feb 9]. Ch. 10.
7. Govinda Dasa, Ambikadatta Shastri, editors. Bhaishajya Rathnavali (Hindi), Ch. 15, Ver.169-172. 19th ed. Varanasi: Chowkhambha Prakashana; 2008. p. 441.
8. Agnivesha, Charaka samhita of Acharya Charaka, Dridhabala Krit, edited by Vaidya Jadavji Trikamji Acharya. Chikitsa Sthana. Ch.18, Ver. 17. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Surbharati Prakashan; 2020. p. 540.
9. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 3. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 282.


10. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 3. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 472.
11. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 1. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2000. p. 280.
12. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 6. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 401.
13. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 4. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 269.
14. Gairola S, Gupta V, Bansal P, Singh R, Maithani M. Herbal antitussives and expectorants - A review. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2010;5:5–9.
15. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 4. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 532.
16. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 5 New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 391.
17. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 5. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 187.

18. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM, Mangal AK, Joseph GV, Raman K, Selvarajan S, et al. editors. Database on Medical Plants used in Ayurveda and Siddha. Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, Government of India, Volume 5. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha; 2008. p. 315.
19. Chikkanna U. Standard Controlled Clinical Study to evaluate the effect of Vidangadi Choorna in the management of Vataja Kasa W.S.R to Tropical Pulmonary Eosinophilia. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN TRADITIONAL MEDICINE. 2019;5(1):19-24.
20. Govinda Dasa, Ambikadatta Shastri, editors. Bhaishajya Rathnavali (Hindi), Ch. 15, Ver.169-172. 19th ed. Varanasi: Chowkhambha Prakashana; 2008. p. 441.
21. Meyer KC. The role of immunity in susceptibility to respiratory infection in the aging lung. Respir Physiol. 2001 Oct;128(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0034-5687(01)00261-4. PMID: 11535259; PMCID: PMC7130717.
22. Agnivesha, Charaka samhita of Acharya Charaka, Dridhabala Krit, edited by Vaidya Jadavji Trikamji Acharya. Chikitsa Sthana. Ch.18, Ver. 10-14. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2016. p. 540.
23. Sushruta, Susruta Samhita of Susruta, Dalhana krit, edited by Vaidya Jadavji Trikamji Acharya, Uttara tantra. Ch. 52, Ver. 4-5. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2015. p. 766.