Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences

2024 Volume 9 Number 12 DECEMBER
Publisherwww.maharshicharaka.in

The Analytical Study of Kaanda Twak of Vata (Ficus Benghalensis Linn.) In Shadrutu Vis - À -Vis Dravyasangraha Kala

Chaithra K1*, Bhat C2, Kalluraya A3
DOI:10.21760/jaims.9.12.9

1* Chaithra K, Final Year Post Graduate Scholar, Dept of Dravya Guna, Muniyal Institute of Ayurveda Medical Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

2 Chandrakanth Bhat, Professor and HOD, Dept of Dravya Guna, Muniyal Institute of Ayurveda Medical Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

3 Archana Kalluraya, Assistant Professor, Dept of Dravya Guna, Muniyal Institute of Ayurveda Medical Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Background: Ayurveda an ancient science, addresses all aspects of life by emphasizing both disease treatment and illness prevention through medicinal plants. Each plant part contains active principles at peak concentrations during specific seasons, with classical texts like Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita and Rajanigantu providing guidelines for their collection. In the 21st century, modern techniques allow us to access the potency of crude drugs, making it essential to collect plant materials during the season that ensures optimal potency.

Aim and objectives:  Total pharmacognostic, phytochemical study of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) bark in each Rutu and compare the values in different Rutu.

Materials and methods: An analytical study of bark of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) collected in six different Rutus was carried out. The bark was collected in six different Rutus and were subjected to pharmacognostic and physicochemical analysis. The aqueous and alcoholic extracts were prepared and the individual extracts were subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis. The results were compared in between the samples and with the standard.

Results: The present analytical study of both Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) carried on 6 different Rutus revealed that the number of phyto-constituents and extractive values varies significantly across the 6 different Rutus and maximum during Shishira Rutu.

Conclusion: The results suggest that there is significant difference in quantity of phytoconstituents of Vata bark in each Rutu.

Keywords: Vata, Banyan tree, Indian banyan, Sangraha Kaala, Traditional medicine, Ayurveda

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Chaithra K, Final Year Post Graduate Scholar, Dept of Dravya Guna, Muniyal Institute of Ayurveda Medical Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Email:
Chaithra K, Bhat C, Kalluraya A, The Analytical Study of Kaanda Twak of Vata (Ficus Benghalensis Linn.) In Shadrutu Vis - À -Vis Dravyasangraha Kala. J Ayu Int Med Sci. 2024;9(12):71-80.
Available From
https://jaims.in/jaims/article/view/3879

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2024-11-08 2024-11-18 2024-11-28 2024-12-09 2024-12-24
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None Nil Yes 12.85

© 2024by Chaithra K, Bhat C, Kalluraya Aand Published by Maharshi Charaka Ayurveda Organization. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Download PDFBack To ArticleIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultDiscussionConclusionReferences

Introduction

Ayurveda emphasizes the entire process of drug utility, including collection, preservation, purification, and formulation. To achieve the desired medicinal effects, it is essential to gather plants according to Ayurvedic principles, focusing on their optimum properties. Experts indicate the importance of Desha, Kala, Rutu and suitable Bhoomi for collecting specific plant parts.[1]

The timing of collection is crucial for maximizing drug potency, ensuring formulations meet quality standards. Each Ayurvedic texts outlines when to collect various plant parts such as roots, stems, bark, leaves, fruits, flowers. In Charaka Samhita, for Kaanda Twak, Sharad Rutu is the proper time of collection.[2]

This research examines the significance of the collection timing of Kaanda Twak of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) across all six seasons to establish its superior potency. Due to high demand for raw herbal drugs, collection often ignore optimal timings, negatively impacting product quality and leading to inconsistent effects in patients.

This study aims across this issue through experimental analysis of Kaanda Twak of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.). Vata having Kashaya Rasa, Guru Guna, Sheeta Virya, Kapha Pitta Nashaka, helpful in Visarpa, Daha and Yoni Dosha.[3]

Materials and Methods

Source of data

The study was conducted in the Research and Development department of Muniyal Institute of Ayurveda Medical Sciences,Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Method of collection of data

Twak of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) was collected from the garden. Bark was collected in 6 different Rutus. Rutus were followed according to Hindu calendar (Panchanga). The bark is collected from same tree throughout the study. The time of collection of bark as per Acharya Charaka is followed i.e., Sharad Rutu. The time of collection of bark of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) is according to table. [Table 1]

Table 1: Showing collection time of Bark of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.)

SNRutuCollection of Bark
1.Greeshma RutuJune 19
2.Varsha RutuAugust 30
3.Sharad RutuNovember 13
4.Hemantha RutuJanuary 11
5.Shishira Rutu March 9
6.Vasata RutuMay 8

Preparation of the trial drug

Bark of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) washed thoroughly with water to remove physical impurities like mud. It is then dried under sun until they were completely dry. After drying, 30gm of the drug was kept apart for macroscopic studies. Then the drug made into a coarse powder and kept preserved in air tight container for phytochemical and physicochemical analysis.

Pharmacognistical evaluation of the trial drug

Organoleptic study

Organoleptic characters of the stem bark of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) like colour, odour, taste and texture is observed and noted.

Macroscopic evaluation

The macroscopic features were compared to local flora for authentication. Plant parts were observed for macroscopic features by placing on a white paper surface. External features of test sample were documented using Canon IXUS digital camera.

jaims_3879_01.JPG
Fig. 1: Collection of Bark

Microscopic examination

Sample was preserved in fixative solution. The fixative used was FAA (Formalin-5ml + Acetic acid-5ml + 70% Ethyl alcohol-90ml).


The materials were left in FAA for more than 48 hours. The preserved specimens were cut into thin transverse section using a sharp blade and sections were stained with saffranine. The slides were also stained with iodine in potassium iodide for detection of starch. Transverse sections were photographed using Zeiss AXIO trinocular microscope attached with Zeiss AxioCam camera under bright field light. Magnifications of figures are indicated by scale-bars.

Powder microscopy

Pinch of bark powder previously sieved was put on slide and mounted in glycerine and powder characters were observed under Zeiss AXIO trinocular microscope attached with Zeiss Axio Cam camera under bright field light.

Phytochemical Study[4]

Loss on drying

Weigh approximately 5 gm of powdered sample and place it in a tared petridish. Dry sample at 105°C for 5 hours in a hot air oven. Remove petridish, cool it in a desiccator, and weigh it. Repeat drying for 30 minutes, cool and weigh again. Continue this process until two consecutive weights are constant. Calculate moisture content percentage using the appropriate formula.
% of loss on drying = (W1+W2) – W3/W2 X 100
Where, W1 – Weight of petridish, W2 – Weight of sample, W3 – Weight of dried sample with dish.

pH value

Prior to measuring pH, electrodes of pH meter were soaked in distilled water for 24 hours. Buffer solution of pH 4, 7 and 9 were prepared by dissolving buffer tablet in 100 ml of distilled water. The pH meter was calibrated using these buffer solutions at 250C. One gram of each coarsely powdered drug was added to 100 ml of distilled water, stirred for 5 minutes, and then filtered separately. After calibration, electrodes were washed with distilled water and wiped, then immersed in test drug solution to record pH. This washing and measuring process was repeated until difference between consecutive readings was less than 0.5.

Determination of total ash value

The clean and dry silica crucible was weighed in which 2 gms of each drugs were taken.

Keep the crucible in a muffle furnace at a temperature not exceeding 600°C until free from carbon. The crucible containing ash was cooled in a desiccator and then weighed. The content of total ash in mg per gm of air - dried material was calculated. Percentage of ash content with reference to drugs were calculated using the formula.

Total Ash = [(W3-W2)/W1]x100

Where W1 – Wt. of drug, W2 – Wt. of empty dish, W3 – Wt. of ash with dish

Determination of acid insoluble ash

Transfer the ash into a beaker and add 25 ml of dilute hydrochloric acid. Wash the crucible with acid and add the washings to the beaker. Heat the mixture until it boils, then filter through ash less filter paper to separate the insoluble matter.

Place the residue and filter paper in a crucible and ignite in a muffle furnace at a temperature not exceeding 450°C until it turns white ash. Cool the crucible in a desiccator and weigh it. Continue heating until a constant weight is achieved, then calculate the percentage of acid insoluble ash using the appropriate formula.

Insoluble ash = [(W3-W2)/W1] x100

Where, W1 – Wt. of the drug powder, W2 – Wt. of crucible, W3 – Wt. of ash with crucible.

Determination of water-soluble extractive value

Accurately weighed 10gm of coarsely powdered drug was placed in a glass Stoppard conical flask. Flask was filled with 100ml distilled water and macerate. The lid was closed for 24 hr. Frequently shaking was done during first 6 hours and allowed to stand for 18 more hours without shaking.

After 24 hours, it was filtered to remove insoluble matter. 25 ml of the filtrate was taken in a weighed silica dish and kept on water bath for evaporation. It is taken out and cooled in a desiccator and weighed. Percentage of water-soluble extractive value was calculated.

Water soluble extract = [(W2-W1) x 100/W x 25] x 100

Where, W – Wt. of drug powder, W1 – Wt. of crucible, W2 – constant weight


Determination of the alcohol soluble extractive value

Accurately weighed 10gm of coarsely powdered drug was placed in a glass Stoppard conical flask. Flask was filled with 100ml alcohol and macerate. The lid was closed for 24 hours. Frequently shaking was done during first 6 hours and allowed to stand for 18 more hours without shaking. After 24 hours, it was filtered to remove insoluble matter. 25 ml of the filtrate was taken in a weighed silica dish and kept on water bath for evaporation. It is taken out and cooled in a desiccator and weighed. Percentage of alcohol soluble extractive value was calculated.
Water soluble extractive = [(W2 – W1) x 100/ W x 25] x 100
Where, W – wt. of drug powder, W1 – wt. of crucible, W2 – Constant weight

Determination of Organic Chemical Constituents

Tests for detection of alkaloid
Mayer’s test

Mayer’s reagent was used for this test. The test filtrate was treated with few drops of this reagent. Formation of cream colour precipitates indicate the presence of alkaloids.

Tests for detection of flavanoids
Alkaline reagent test

To the test filtrate, add few drops of dilute Sodium hydroxide solution. Appearance of Dark yellow colour which turns colourless on addition of few drops of dil. Hydrochloric acid indicates the presence of flavonoids.

Tests for detection of tannins and phenolic compounds
Ferric chloride reagent

A 5 percent w/v solution of ferric chloride in 90 percent alcohol was prepared. Few drops of this solution were added to a little of the above filtrate. Appearance of dark green or dark blue indicate the presence of tannins.

Tests for detection of glycosides
Kellar-killani test

The solution was dissolved in 1 ml of glacial acetic acid containing traces of ferric chloride and transferred to 1 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid,

to get the reddish-brown colour at junction indicate the presence of glycosides.

Tests for detection of steroids
Salkowaski test

To the extract, 2 ml of chloroform was mixed with few drops of conc. H2SO4 and shaked well and allowed to stand for some time, red colour appears at the lower end indicate the presence of steroid.

Tests for detection of carbohydrates
Fehling’s test

To the test filtrate, 1 ml of Fehling’s A and 1 ml of Fehling’s B solutions were added and boiled in water bath for 5-10 minutes. First a yellow, then a brick red precipitate if obtained, indicates the presence of carbohydrates.

Tests for detection of proteins
Biuret test

To the test filtrate, 1 ml of 4% sodium hydroxide solution was added to it, followed by a drop of 1% solution of copper sulphate is added. Appearance of violet or pink color indicate the presence of proteins.

Tests for detection of saponins
Foam test

To the small quantity of filtrate, add few ml of distilled water and shake well. Appearance of froth indicate the presence of saponins.

Determination Of Total Phenolic Content[5]

Reference: Singleton & Rossi 1965; Mahdavi et al., 2010 and Wern K. H., et al., 2016.

Procedure

Take different concentrations of 0.4 ml of samples, standard (Gallic acid) and blank sample separately. Add 3.6 ml of distilled water to all the samples. Add 0.4 ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent to all the samples. Add 4 ml of 7 % sodium carbonate to all the samples.

All the samples are made up to the volume 10 ml with distilled water, followed by thorough mixing and allowed to incubation for 90 minutes at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 765 nm. Calibration curve will be plotted using Gallic acid standard. The result will be expressed as Gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE / 100ml)


Result

Macroscopic study of Vata

Fresh bark is typically smooth and light gray to greenish in colour. The bark is rough with fissures and relatively thick. Fresh cut surface exudates plenty of latex. Dried Outer surface of bark is brown in colour while the inner surface is cream in colour with lot of fibres. [Fig. 2-3]

jaims_3879_02.JPG
Fig. 2: Fresh bark of Vata

jaims_3879_03.JPG
Fig. 3: Dried bark of Vata

jaims_3879_04.JPG
Fig. 4: Stem bark

Microscopic study of Vata

Macroscopic study of bark of Ficus benghalensis Linn. Shows the following parts – cork, lactiferous tubes, stone cells, sclereids, phloem, prismatic crystals of calcium oxalate. [Fig 4-8]

jaims_3879_05.JPG
Fig. 5: Cork 1 and 2

jaims_3879_06.JPG
Fig. 6: Stone cells and starch


Ck - cork; ltt - laticiferous tubes; SC - stone cell; Scl - sclereids; SC and stc - stone cell and starch

jaims_3879_07.JPG
Fig. 7: Phloem region

jaims_3879_08.JPG
Fig. 8: Medullary rays

Prc - Prismtic crystals of calcium oxalate; Ph - phloem, MR - medullary ray

Powder microscopy of Vata

Powder microscopy of bark of Ficus benghalensis Linn. shows – stone cells, phloem with sieve tube and companion cells, sclereids, prismatic crystals. [Fig 9-15]

jaims_3879_09.JPG
Fig. 9: Powder of Vata

jaims_3879_10.JPG
Fig. 10: Stone cells

jaims_3879_11.JPG
Fig. 11: Phloem with sieve tube and Companion cells


jaims_3879_12.JPG
Fig. 12: Rhytidoma in surface view

jaims_3879_13.JPG
Fig. 13: Sclereids

jaims_3879_14.JPG
Fig. 14: Sclereids, stone cells, prismatic crystal

jaims_3879_15.JPG
Fig. 15: Stone cells

Result of Physico-Chemical Parameters

Values of loss on drying, total ash, acid insoluble ash and extractive value of bark of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) showed varied values in different Rutu. [Table 2]

Table 2: Showing physico-chemical parameter of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.)

GreeshmaVarshaSharadHemanthaShishiraVasantha
Loss on drying13.74910.3311.0313.7413.98
pH6.526.425.936.476.346.39
Total ash11.986.456.536.066.094.89
Acid insoluble ash1.491.781.830. 990.991.19
Water soluble extractive13.5815.768.068.0413.5911.67
Alcohol soluble extractive10.6117.347.916.3113.5815.73

Results of Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis

Phytochemical analysis of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) shows the presence of alkaloids, tannin, glycosides, carbohydrates, proteins, steroids, saponin. [Table 3]

Table 3: Showing tests for phytochemical analysis of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.)

GreeshmaVarshaSharadHemantaShishiraVasanta
AqAlAqAlAqAlAqAlAqAlAqAl
Flavanoids------------
Alkaloids++++++++++++
Tannin++++++++++++
Glycosides++++++++++++
Steroids++++++++++++
Carbohydrate++++++++++++
Protein++++++++++++
Saponin+-+-+-+-+-+-

Table 4: Showing total phenolic content estimation of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.)

Vata 1Vata 2Vata 3Vata 4Vata 5Vata 6
Conc.GreeshmaVarshaSharadHemanthaShishiraVasantha
12.532.443.265.919.717.38
23.764.245.796.7411.127.71
44.947.627.859.3512.829.44
87.889.478.8210.9414.0310.29
108.8812.9111.0315.6215.6513.35
2010.0914.1813.7916.2925.3514.62
4012.0616.9414.8826.2441.7416.15
8014.0920.0919.5932.4763.5028.12
10019.2425.9121.6843.8877.4429.38
20041.5952.3841.6890.79141.3258.88
40095.71112.2678.68165.88245.5696.09
800154.82175.91131.21301.41403.94177.97
1000207.15222.21153.85346.24474.15194.35

Total Phenolic Content Estimation

Estimation of Total Phenolic Content (TPC) shows highest concentration of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) in Shishira Rutu and lowest concentration in Greeshma Rutu. [Table 4]

Discussion

Phytochemical study

Loss on drying

This is the test designed to determine the moisture content and number of volatile substances in the sample. If the moisture content of the sample was within the acceptable range, suggesting that the sample can be stored for a longer period and is less likely to be affected by microbes. Moisture content of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) was highest in Vasantha Rutu and lowest in Varsha Rutu. These values fluctuate based on local conditions and harvesting methods. Highest value may be because of seasonal humidity levels.

pH

Bark samples of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) of six Rutu having acidic pH i.e., < 7. This variation in pH may indicate the presence of certain organic acids which may influence the chemical properties of the bark or seasonal changes like temperature, humidity and rainfall which can affect the metabolic processes of the trees, leading to variations in pH.

Ash value

The ash value of crude drugs is a measure of the inorganic residue remaining after the drug is incinerated. It indicates the total amount of minerals or impurities present in the drug. All the values of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) are within the normal range i.e., not more than 8% but in Greeshma Rutu it exceeds normal limit i.e., 11.98. It may be due to several factors. During this season, environmental stressors such as high temperatures and reduced moisture can influence the plants metabolic processes. This can lead to increased mineral accumulation in plant tissues, resulting in a higher ash content. If the plant absorbs more minerals to cope with the heat, this can further raise the total ash content. For acid insoluble ash value of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.), the observations found were within the normal limit i.e., not more than 3%.

Extractive value

Extractive values of crude drugs refer to the amounts of soluble components that can be extracted from a drug using various solvents. These values help in assess the quality and concentration of active constituents among the different drugs. Water and alcohol soluble extractive values of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) are within normal range.

Total phenolic content estimation

Total phenols content of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) is highest during Shishira Rutu and lowest in Greeshma Rutu. Total phenolic content is highest in certain seasons due to environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and light conditions that influence phenolic synthesis.

During these periods, plants might produce more phenolics as a defence mechanism against stress, pests, or UV radiation. Additionally, phenolic compounds often serve essential role in growth and development, which can vary throughout the year, leading to fluctuations in their concentrations.

Another interpretation could be that the physiological state of the plant during different Rutus affects phenolic content. In seasons like Shishira, plants may be in a phase of active growth or recovery from stress, leading to increased phenolic synthesis for protection and metabolic functions.

Conversely, in Greeshma Rutu, the plant may prioritize survival over secondary metabolite production due to heat and drought, resulting in lower phenolic levels. Additionally, the timing of bark collection may coincide with periods of phenolic degradation or lower metabolic activity, further contributing to the observed variations in total phenolic content.

Acharya Charaka has told collection of bark in Sharad Rutu[6] but the current study interprets the total phenols is more in Shishira Rutu for Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.). But there are differences in phenolic estimation in each Rutu. The current study has interpreted that collection time of bark in case of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) more suits according to Sushruta as he told Sowmya Dravya is to be collected in Sowmya Rutu.[7] As the Dravya have Kashaya Rasa and Sheeta Virya which is suggestive of Sowmya Dravya.


Conclusion

All samples were subjected to thorough pharmacognostic, phytochemical and quantitative studies. The results were analysed and compared and following conclusions were drawn. Physiochemical and phytochemical study of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) were carried out and some of the results are as per standards. In physiochemical analysis, total ash value of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) is more than normal limit in Greeshma Rutu but values are within normal limit in shard Rutu and that of acid insoluble ash, all values are within normal limit. In water and alcohol soluble extractive, values in each Rutu showed normal limit even in Sharad Rutu. The phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of alkaloids, tannins, glycosides, steroids, carbohydrates, proteins, saponin. Total phenolic content estimation on aqueous extract of Vata (Ficus benghalensis Linn.) was done which quantifies the gallic acid which shows the higher results in Shishira Rutu. There is difference in total phenolic content in each Rutu but significance of collection of bark at Sharad Rutu according to Acharya Charaka is not met. However, Sushruta claim of Soumya Dravya in Sowmya Rutu has fulfilled satisfactorily.

References

1. Lucas DS. Dravyaguna Vijnana, Volume 1. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Vishvabharati; 2012. p. 321-326, p. 455.

2. Acharya Jadavaji Trikamji, editor. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Chakrapanidatta’s Ayurveda Deepika. Kalpa Sthana, Madana Kalpa 5/10. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Orientalia; p. 857, p. 940.

3. Mishra B, Vaishya R, editors. Bhavaprakasha Nigantu of Sribhava Mishra, Prathama Bhaga, Vatadi Varga, verses 1-5, 8-9, 11. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Bhawan; 2013. p. 519-520, p. 959.

4. Lavekar GS, Padhi MM. Laboratory Guide for the Analysis of Ayurveda and Siddha Formulations. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha; p. 42-45, 81-87, p. 154.

5. Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. Am J Enol Vitic [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ajevonline.org.

6. Acharya Jadavaji Trikamji, editor. Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Chakrapanidatta’s Ayurveda Deepika. Kalpa Sthana, Madana Kalpa 5/10. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Orientalia; p. 857, p. 940.

7. Acharya Jadavji Trikamji, editor. Sushruta Samhita of Sushruta, Dalhana’s Nibandhasangraha, Sutra Sthana; Bhumipravibhagiya Adhyaya 36/5. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2021. p. 159, p. 524.

Disclaimer / Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.