E-ISSN:2456-3110

Research Article

Ayurvedic therapists

Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences

2024 Volume 9 Number 2 February
Publisherwww.maharshicharaka.in

Ergonomics in work situations of Ayurvedic therapists working in Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur

Varghese B1*, Giri P2
DOI:10.21760/jaims.9.2.7

1* Betsy Varghese, Assistant Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, Glocal College of Ayurvedic Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India.

2 PV Giri, Professor, Dept of Kayachikitsa, Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Introduction: Ergonomics is defined as the process of designing or arranging workplaces, products and systems so that they fit the people who use them. Physical, organizational and cognitive are the three types of ergonomics. Aims and Objectives: To assess the prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD) in Ayurvedic therapists working in, Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur. Materials and Methods: A Descriptive cross sectional study was done. 17 therapists in VACH Ollur were surveyed consecutively regarding symptoms of Musculoskeletal disorders mainly LBA, neck pain, shoulder pain, knee pain and heel pain. Data were collected by using questionnaires and were analysed using appropriate statistical methods. Results: Out of 17 therapists, 52.9 % were females. Highest frequency of MSD was seen in the age group of 46-55 years. 80 % of the therapists were working more than 20 years. 64.5 % were suffering from LBA, 29.4% were suffering from neck pain, 23.8% were suffering from shoulder pain, 41.2% were suffering from knee pain and 17.6 % were suffering from heel pain. Discussion: Present study shows that MSD are common among therapists. Improper posture for different procedure can be the reason. Adhering to the principles of physical and cognitive ergonomics can prevent risk factors of developing MSD.

Keywords: Ayurvedic therapists, Cognitive ergonomics, Ergonomics, MSD, Organisational ergonomics, Physical ergonomics

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Betsy Varghese, Assistant Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, Glocal College of Ayurvedic Medical Sciences and Research Centre, , Uttar Pradesh, India.
Email:
Varghese B, Giri P, Ergonomics in work situations of Ayurvedic therapists working in Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur. J Ayu Int Med Sci. 2024;9(2):39-42.
Available From
https://jaims.in/jaims/article/view/2977

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2023-12-08 2023-12-18 2023-12-28 2024-01-08 2024-01-16
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None declared Nil yes 20.71

© 2024by Varghese B, Giri Pand Published by Maharshi Charaka Ayurveda Organization. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Ergonomics is the study of aligning the needs of a job with the ability of the worker and work environment to provide the most efficient workspace possible while simultaneously reducing the risk of injury. The primary goal of ergonomics has been reducing the rate of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), but it also includes the efficiency, quality, quantity, and comfort of the labor being produced with aims for maximizing these components while minimizing worker injury, turnover, and fatigue/overexertion.[1] Examples of workplace risk factors include jobs requiring repetitious, forceful, or persistent use of the upper extremity, frequent lifting, pushing, pulling heavy objects, or maintaining prolonged uncomfortable postures for an extended period.[2] The reduction of WMSDs is often considered the largest concern for ergonomics. Back, neck, and upper extremity injuries are some of the more common WMSDs, with studies demonstrating correlations between certain specific movements and combination of movements within work (lifting, twisting, prolonged walking/standing, squatting, prolonged standing, and repetitive motions) placing individuals at an increased risk for developing WMSDs.[3][4] Physical, organizational and cognitive are the three types of ergonomics. Through workplace design and assessment, including postures, manual labour, and repetitive motions, physical ergonomics aims to prevent injuries. The structures, rules, and procedures of any organisation are taken into account by organisational ergonomics. The field of ergonomics that focuses on creating simple, understandable, and user-friendly products is called cognitive ergonomics.

According to Ayurveda, Padachatushaya is essential for the effective management of the illness.

Upasthatha, one of the Padachatushaya can be considered as a bystander or Ayurvedic therapist who is doing all kind of external treatments including Abhyangam (External Application of oil), Pizhichil etc. Lack of good quality of work can have an effect on the treatment of the patient. Ayurvedic therapists are subjected to do their work in a prolonged standing posture, repetitive motion of 30 minutes to 1 hour duration. So, they are more prone to risk factors of MSDs.

So, this study is planned to assess the prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD) in Ayurvedic therapists working in, Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur.

Aims and Objectives

To assess the prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD) in Ayurvedic therapists working in Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

A Descriptive cross sectional study was done.

Study settings

In Patient Department of Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur.

Study Population

17 Ayurvedic therapists in Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur were surveyed consecutively regarding symptoms of Musculoskelektal disordes mainly LBA, neck pain, shoulder pain, knee pain and heel pain.

Inclusion criteria

Therapists who were present on the day of survey were taken for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Therapist who were absent on the day were excluded.

Sampling technique

Therapists were randomly selected with inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Study tools and data collection

Data were collected by using questionnaires and were analysed using appropriate statistical methods.

Procedure

17 therapists working in Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur who were present on the day of survey were taken for the study. A structured questionnaire was prepared and filled by the therapists. Based on the data collected, the prevalence of MSD among the therapists was


assessed. The purpose of the study was explained to participant before interviewing. Trained health personnel assisted participants who could not read or write in completing the questionnaire.

Data collection

The following data were collected from the questionnaire

1. Socio demographic characteristics of the therapists including age and gender

2. Working experience

3. Musculoskeletal disorder symptoms

The data were entered and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.

Statistical analysis of collected data

The collected data were recorded and analysed under the following headings:

1. Socio demographic data

2. Working experience

3. Musculoskeletal disorder symptoms

In this study, socio demographic data of age, gender, working experience and symptoms of MSD were recorded. The data was grouped and entered in a master excel sheet. Frequency distribution of the different variables was statistically analysed.

Ethical consideration

An informed consent was obtained from each patient before study.

Observations and Results

The total number of therapists in this study distributed between the age of 27 years and 53 years with mean of 42.176 with standard deviation 8.0174. Female predominance (52.9) was seen in the study. Working experience distributed between 1 year and 32 year with mean of 13.235 with standard deviation of 12.0288. 80% of the therapists having a working experience of more than 20 years.

Table 1: Age descriptive

MinimumMaximumMeanStd. Deviation
27.053.042.1768.0174

Table 2: Distribution according to gender

FrequencyPercent
Female952.9
Male847.1
Total17100.0

Table 3: Working experience descriptive

MinimumMaximumMeanStd. Deviation
1.032.013.23512.0288

Among the 17 therapists, 64.5 % were suffering from LBA, 29.4% were suffering from neck pain, 23.8% were suffering from shoulder pain, 41.2% were suffering from knee pain and 17.6 % were suffering from heel pain.

Table 4: Presence of LBA

LBAFrequencyPercent
No635.3
Yes1164.7
Total17100.0

Table 5: Presence of Neck pain

Neck painFrequencyPercent
No1270.6
Yes529.4
Total17100.0

Table 6: Presence of Shoulder pain

Shoulder painFrequencyPercent
No1376.5
Yes423.5
Total17100.0

Table 7: Presence of knee pain

Knee painFrequencyPercent
No1058.8
Yes741.2
Total17100.0

Table 8: Presence of heel pain

Heel painFrequencyPercent
No1482.4
Yes317.6
Total17100.0

Discussion

This study was undertaken to assess the prevalence


of MSD in Ayurvedic therapists working in Vaidyaratnam Ayurveda College, Ollur, Trissur. From the above findings it is clear that MSDs are common among therapists. As the working hours and patient allotted to each therapist are equal so we can say that organisational ergonomics are satisfied. Improper posture for different procedures can be the reason. Each Ayurvedic external procedures including Abhayanga (External Application of oil), Pizhichil (Pouring oil over the body) etc requires time duration of 30 minutes to 1 hour. Prolonged standing posture around one hour can be the reason for heel and knee pain. A crucial factor in these MSDs is the height of the therapist and the treatment table. In order to effectively treat patients, a short therapist must apply greater pressure on the knee and heel. All procedures are performed with a small forward bend in posture. The lower back and spine are positioned incorrectly during all treatments, which may be the cause of low back discomfort. Shoulder pain could result from the majority of procedures that need repetitive motions of the shoulder joint. Another significant aspect influencing the therapists' health status is receiving continuous therapy one after the other. A 20–30 minute break should be permitted following every procedure to prevent stressing out the muscles and joints. MSD affects a person's social, psychological, and physical well-being, which eventually lowers their productivity and quality of life. Repetitive motions, bad illumination, mental stress, physical conditioning, incorrect posture, age, and genetic predisposition are risk factors for MSDs. The physical and mental health of therapists can be enhanced by providing them with enough rest after each procedure, calming exercises, height adjustable treatment tables, Panchakarma treatments, Yoga, and meditation techniques. To design and implement a complete strategy to reduce the chances of a work-related injury, a thorough understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying these issues is required.There are certain researches which have already established connection between RSI (Repeated strain injury) and MSDs.[5,6]

Conclusion

Upasthatha is one among the Padachathushtaya plays an important role in Chikitsa. Present study shows that MSDs are common among therapists, which will affect their quality of

work and productivity. Lack of good quality of work can also have an effect on the treatment of the patient. As the working hours and patient allotted to each therapist are equal so we can say that organisational ergonomics are satisfied. Improper posture for different procedures can be the reason. Height Adjustable treatment tables can prevent the extra pressure given to heels and knees. Adhering to the principles of physical and cognitive ergonomics can prevent risk factors of developing MSDs.

References

1. Edwards C, Fortingo N, Franklin E. Ergonomics. [Updated 2022 Jul 28]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580551/

2. Gupta A, Bhat M, Mohammed T, Bansal N, Gupta G. Ergonomics in dentistry.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent.2014 Jan;7(1):30-4.[PMC free article] [PubMed].

3. Waters TR, Dick RB. Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness.Rehabil Nurs.2015 May-Jun;40(3):148-65.[PMC free article] [PubMed]

4. Andersen LL, Vinstrup J, Sundstrup E, Skovlund SV, Villadsen E, Thorsen SV. Combined ergonomic exposures and development of musculoskeletal pain in the general working population: A prospective cohort study.Scand J Work Environ Health.2021 May 01;47(4):287-295.[PMC free article] [PubMed]

5. Baba, N.H. & Daruis, Dian. (2016). Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI) among computer users: A case study in telecommunication company. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2016. 48-52.

6. https://www.wellnomics.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Wellnomics-white-paper-The-research-on-RSI-and-Breaks.pdf